<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Chimes in on Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.derekbodner.com/2008/05/30/microsoft-chimes-in-on-open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.derekbodner.com/2008/05/30/microsoft-chimes-in-on-open-source/</link>
	<description>Geek talk, sports and ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:48:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: escapenguin</title>
		<link>http://blog.derekbodner.com/2008/05/30/microsoft-chimes-in-on-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>escapenguin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 03:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.derekbodner.com/2008/05/30/microsoft-chimes-in-on-open-source/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Modular architecture?  What the hell does that have to do with open source &quot;development models&quot;?  Are they insane?

Microsoft will only benefit by borrowing code.  Good for them contributing back I guess, but that&#039;s what you&#039;re supposed to do anyway and they really only had their own self-preservation in mind while doing so.  Microsoft needs to be a friend to the community or they will ultimately fail no matter what... locking out open source apps with proprietary code doesn&#039;t cut it anymore.  If the hardware vendors can learn from that mistake, Microsoft, you can too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modular architecture?  What the hell does that have to do with open source &#8220;development models&#8221;?  Are they insane?</p>
<p>Microsoft will only benefit by borrowing code.  Good for them contributing back I guess, but that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re supposed to do anyway and they really only had their own self-preservation in mind while doing so.  Microsoft needs to be a friend to the community or they will ultimately fail no matter what&#8230; locking out open source apps with proprietary code doesn&#8217;t cut it anymore.  If the hardware vendors can learn from that mistake, Microsoft, you can too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
